BASIC METEOROLOGICAL PROCESSES

AIR POLLUTION METEOROLOGY
 

In order to perform dispersion calculations which are discussed in the air quality modeling section, it is important for one to understand meteorological aspects of air pollution. In this section basic concepts of meteorology are discussed for solving and understanding air pollution problems. The chapter is divided into four major sections:

For in-depth information and some fascinating trivia on atmospheric phenomena go to "http://www.vol.it/UK/EN/SCIENCE/METEOROLOGY/"

The site also includes important links to various weather forecasting and meteorological institutions all over.


ATMOSPHERE
 

The problem of air pollution occurs in the earth's atmosphere. The chemical composition and the physical characteristics of the atmosphere are helpful for interpretation of the pollution cloud. The atmosphere is a mixture of gases. The concentration of each gas varies from trace levels to very high levels. Nitrogen and oxygen are the main constituents. Some constituents such as water vapor vary in space and time.

The earth’s atmosphere can be divided into several layers, depending on the temperature profile. The four major layers are:

        troposphere

        stratosphere

        mesosphere

        thermosphere.

The discussion in this course will be limited to troposphere, and stratosphere.


ATMOSPHERIC THERMODYNAMICS
 

In order to study the atmospheric flows, a parcel of air is defined using the state variables. These variables define the state of an element of the atmosphere. The three important state variables are density, pressure and temperature. For an explanation of atmospheric pressure and experiments you can perform to examine the force exerted by the weight of air, go to "http://kids.mtpe.hq.nasa.gov/air_pressure/index.html"

The units and dimensions for the state variables are given in the following table.

Table

Units and Dimensions for State Variables

Density ( Mass / Volume )
  • gm / cm 3
  • M L - 3
    Pressure ( Force / Area )
  • N / m 2
  • millibar = 10 -3 bar 
    1 bar = 10 6 dynes / cm 2
    1 atm = 1013.25 mb 
    1 atm = 101.325 kPa
    M L - 1 T - 2
    Temperature
  • o F, o R, o C, o K
  • o C = o K - 273.15
    T

    Humidity is the fourth important variable in the study of atmospheric flows which tells us about the amount of water vapor present in a sample of moist air.

    Meteorologists also use the term specific volume instead of density. The specific volume is defined as:

    Specific Volume, Undisplayed Graphic= 1 / Density


    Problem 1

    Determine the pressure, both absolute and gauge, exerted at the bottom of the column of liquid 1 meter high, with density of 1200 kg / m3

    Solution

    Pgauge = (density of liquid) X ( acceleration due to gravity) X (height of liquid column)

    Pgauge = ( 1200 kg/m3 ) X ( 9.7 m/s2 ) X ( 1 N/kg/m/s2)

    Pgauge = 11.760 kN/m2

    Pgauge = 11.760 kPa
     

    Pabsolute = Pgauge + Patmospheric

    Pabsolute = 11.760 kPa + 101.3 kPa

    Pabsolute = 113.06 kPa


    Equation of State

    The relationship between the three state variables may be written as:

    Undisplayed Graphic

    For a perfect gas,

    Undisplayed Graphic

    where,

    The specific gas constant for dry air, R d = 0.287 Joules / gm /oK, and for water vapor, R v = 0.461 Joules / gm /oK. The specific gas constant for wet air will not be constant quantity but will depend on mixing ratio.


    Problem 2

    Calculate the density of a gas with a molecular weight of 29 @ 1 atm(absolute) and 80 oF. Gas constant, R = 0.7302 ft3atm/lb-moleoR

    Solution

    Absolute Temperature = 80 oF + 460 = 540 oR

    Density = P ( molecular weight) / RT

    Density = ( 1atm. ) . (29 lb/lb mole) / ( 0.7302 ft3atm/lb-moleoR). (540 oR)

    Density = 0.073546 lb/ ft3

    Solve this problem online using applet DENS 1.0.


    First Law of Thermodynamics

    The first law of thermodynamics is based on the law of conservation of total energy of a thermodynamic system which undergoes a change of state. Mathematically one can write it as:

    Undisplayed Graphic

    Heat added per unit mass = (Change in internal energy per unit mass) + (work done by a unit mass)


    Second Law of thermodynamics

    There are several different statements for the second law of thermodynamics in the physics books. In summary, the law can be stated as "no cyclic process exists having the transference of heat from a colder to hotter body as its sole effect".


    Specific Heats

    The specific heat is defined as the amount of heat needed to change the temperature of unit mass by 1oK. The specific heat can be computed at the constant volume or at constant pressure. The definitions are:

    Specific Heat at Constant Volume

    Undisplayed Graphic

    Specific Heat at Constant Pressure

    Undisplayed Graphic
     

    The Carnot's Law provides a relationship between Cp and Cv. For a perfect gas,

    C p - C v = R
     

    For a perfect diatomic gas ( approximation to dry air), Cp and Cv can be obtained from,

    C p = (7/2) . R, and

    C v = (5/2) . R
     

    For dry air, the value of

    C pd = 1.003 Joules / gm / oK, and

    C vd = 0.717 Joules / gm / oK

    The ratio of Cp, and Cv is given by Undisplayed Graphic= Cp / Cv = 1.4 (for dry air). The value of Undisplayed Graphic for dry air is 1.4. The value of Undisplayed Graphic will be different for different gases.


    PROCESSES  IN THE ATMOSPHERE
     

    When an air parcel moves from one point to another point in the atmosphere, it can follow several different paths. These are:

          Constant Pressure known as " isobaric " change

          Constant Volume known as " isosteric " change

          Constant Temperature known as " isothermal " change

          Constant Entropy known as " Isentropic " change

          Adiabatic Process i.e. Undisplayed GraphicQ= 0 (no heat added or removed from the air parcel)

                     The adiabatic Law is Undisplayed Graphic


    STATISTICS OF THE ATMOSPHERE

    The vertical variations of parameters such as pressure are studied.

    The Hydrostatic Equation:

    The pressure variation in a "motionless" atmosphere is given by:

    Undisplayed Graphic

    where, the left hand side term is the vertical pressure gradient per unit mass, and the right hand side term represents gravitational force per unit mass.

     If the atmosphere is not "motionless", Newton's second law can be used to write the general equation as:

    Undisplayed Graphic

     The hydrostatic equation can be used to derive a relationship between pressure and elevation of the air parcel. The hydrostatic equation and the equation of state can be rewritten as:

    Undisplayed Graphic

     Integration of the equation yields:

    Undisplayed Graphic

     The initial conditions used in the integration are: z = 0, p = 0

    Thus the variation of pressure depends on the vertical profile of temperature.

    For an isothermal atmosphere, one can integrate the left hand side term of the above equation as:

    Undisplayed Graphic

    Where, To is the temperature of isothermal atmosphere.

    Simple calculation using the equation show that the pressure decreases exponentially with height at a ratio of 12.24 mb per 100 meter.


    LAPSE RATE
     

    The lapse rate is the rate of change of temperature with height and is defined as,

    Undisplayed Graphic

    The value of Undisplayed Graphic varies throughout the atmosphere.


    POTENTIAL TEMPERATURE

    In order to compare two air parcels at the same temperatures and different pressures, the concept of potential temperature is useful.

    The relationship between temperature and pressure can be derived using the first law of thermodynamics as follows:

    Undisplayed Graphic

    Consider adiabatic flow

    dH = 0

    0 = Cp dT - a dp

    0 = Cp dT - (RT/p)*dp

    Cp dT = (RT/p)*dp

    dT/T = (R/Cp)*(dp/p)

    d (ln T) = (R/Cp)*d(ln p)

    Integrate from ( T, p ) to ( To, po )

    Undisplayed Graphic

    Define potential temperature Undisplayed Graphic as the temperature corresponding to the pressure po = 1000 mb,

    Undisplayed Graphic


    ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY

    Atmospheric stability is defined as the ability of the atmosphere to enhance or to resist atmospheric motions. A simple way to determine the atmospheric stability is to use dry adiabatic lapse rate (d). The following table shows the conditions for different atmospheric lapse rates.

    LAPSE RATE
    ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY
      > d
    Unstable
       = d
    Neutral
       < d
    Stable

    In the above table, the value of the dry adiabatic lapse rate is -1 oC/100 m. The environmental lapse rate is positive in a strongly stable atmosphere while it is negative in an unstable atmosphere.

    For more detailed information on Atmospheric Stability, go to the following slide show.

    "http://cnr.umn.edu/NRES/courses/fr3103/slides/day10/"

    and

    "http://www.worc.ac.uk/departs/envman/Staff/Rowland/ums/env/mec/climate/PhysicsBackground/Adibatic2.html"



    ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY CLASSIFICATION

      Over the last several decades, a number of classification systems have been proposed to define atmospheric stability. Some of these schemes are explained below.

    P- G Method

    P- G method is one of the oldest methods to define atmospheric stability. The method requires the measurements of

    The approach is based on original field work. The cloud observations are expensive. The scheme is given in the following table:

    PASQUILL- GIFFORD STABILITY CATEGORIES
    Surface Wind
    ( Measured at 10 m )
    ( m / sec. )
    Surface Wind
    ( Measured at 10 m )
    ( mph )
    Day 
    Incoming Solar Radiation**
    ( Insolation )
    ( Strong )
    Day 
    Incoming Solar Radiation**
    ( Insolation )
    ( Moderate )
    Day 
    Incoming Solar Radiation**
    ( Insolation )
    ( Slight )
    Night*
    ( Thin Overlast 
    or
    >= 4/8 cloudiness* )
    Night*
    ( <= 3/8 cloudiness* )
    < 2
    < 4.5
    A
    A-B
    B
    F
    F
    2 - 3
    4.5 - 6.7
    A-B
    B
    C
    E
    F
    3 - 5
    6.7 - 11.2
    B
    B-C
    C
    D
    E
    5 - 6
    11.2 - 13.4
    C
    C-D
    D
    D
    D
    6
    13.4
    C
    D
    D
    D
    D
    *   Night is defined as the period from 1 hour before sunset to 1 hr. after sunrise
    ** Appropriate insolation categories may be determined through the use of sky cover and solar elevation information as follows :
    Sky Cover 
    ( Opaque or Total )
    Solar Elevation 
    Angle > 60 o
    Solar Elevation
    Angle < 60 o
    but, > 35 o
    Solar Elevation
    Angle < 35 o
    but, > 15 o
    4/8 or less or,
    Any amount of High Thin Clouds
    Strong
    Moderate
    Slight
    5/8 to 7/8 Middle Clouds
    ( 700 ft. - 16000 ft. base )
    Moderate
    Slight
    Slight
    5/8 to 7/8 Low Clouds
    ( Less than 7000 foot base )
    Slight
    Slight
    Slight

    P-G / NWS Method

    This is a variation of P-G method. The only difference between P-G method and this method is that on-site cloud cover observations are replaced by the observation taken at the National Weather Service (NWS) station in that area. The disadvantage of the method is the use of second-hand information for cloud cover. 
    The STAR Method

    The instrumentation for monitoring atmospheric stability is relatively expensive and is typically difficult to maintain. The instruments are used in remote locations where trained environmental scientists are not present, and at facilities where personnel are engaged in activities other than the hour by hour monitoring of the weather and/or at plants where it is required by law. The national Climatic Center ( NCC ) in Asheville, North Carolina utilizes a stability computation method which does not require special instruments but, rather, relies solely on the hourly weather observations made by meteorologists at National Weather Service ( NWS ) stations. Unstable conditions occur primarily during periods of strong surface heating and low wind speeds, and stable conditions occur only when the earth's heat is escaping to space ( high negative net radiation ) and winds are light. Also, neutral conditions can occur when it is cloudy and/or windy. The NCC method, then utilizes observations of cloud cover, made hourly by stations weather observer, coupled with the wind speed observed when the sky observation was made.

    The data produced from the cloud cover and wind speed observations are referred to as STAR ( for STability ARray ) data. Historical STAR data are extremely useful because they can be obtained quickly from the NCC and they are inexpensive.



    BNL Scheme

    Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) scheme depends entirely on horizontal wind direction fluctuations. This system will not work if a definite relationship between horizontal fluctuation and vertical fluctuation does not exist at a site.

    The classification are as follows:

    Type A   : Fluctuations ( peak to peak ) of the horizontal wind direction exceeding 90o ( Extremely Unstable )

    Type B2 : Fluctuations ranging from 40o - 90o

    Type B1 : Fluctuations similar to A and B2, but confined to 15o and 45o limits ( Unstable )

    Type C   : Fluctuations greater than 15o distinguished by the unbroken solid core of the trace ( Neutral )

    Type D   : The trace approximates a line; short - term fluctuations do not exceed 15o ( Stable )

    Note : Fluctuations are recorded over a 1 hr. period.

    Sigma Phi Method:

    The atmospheric stability can be determined using the standard deviation of elevation angle (phi) of the vertical wind direction. Sigma phi is a good indicator of the scale and intensity of the vertical motions of the atmosphere. The disadvantage of the method is that it requires a highly dedicated maintenance program to assure proper calibration of the system.

    Sigma Omega Method:

    In this method, sigma phi is indirectly calculated using the standard deviation of the vertical wind speed (sigma omega) and the average horizontal wind speed. This approach reduces the maintenance requirements of the sigma phi method.

    Wind Direction Standard Deviation (Sigma Theta) Method:

    The standard deviation of horizontal wind direction is an atmospheric stability classification system recommended by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The limits of sigma theta as given in Regulatory Guide 1.23 are given in the following table.

    Modified Sigma Theta Method:

    Mitchell and Timbre (1979) attempted to modify the NRC sigma theta method (MST) in order to account for lack of insolation during nighttime. The definition for nighttime was: one hour before sunset to one hour after sunrise. According to MST scheme, if stability class based on sigma theta at night is neutral (D) or stable (E,F,G), the stability class is based directly on sigma theta. If it is unstable (A,B,C), the observed wind speed and corresponding stability class are located in the following table and the associated stability class applicable to sigma z is identified. The MST method involves correction factors for plume meander that occur under low wind speed and nighttime conditions.

    NRC Temperature Difference Method:

    NRC Regulatory Guide 1.23 indicates the use of temperature differences with height for computing standard deviations of the plume. This method relates a set of ranges of temperature lapse rates (oC/100m) to the Pasquill-Gifford classes.

    Wind Speed ratio (UR) Method:

    Sedefian and Bennett (1980) suggested the use of wind speed ratio (UR) for defining the atmospheric stability. The relationship between stability and UR is shown below.

    Four different atmospheric stability indicators have been examined by Scott-Waslikand & Kumar (1982) for their potential use in a radio nuclide dispersion model at a nuclear power plant.

    The schemes are:

    The other four schemes were not studied because sufficient meteorological data were unavailable. Inconsistencies were observed between the four schemes for the seven stability classes. The results of this analysis indicate:

    The temperature difference and sigma theta methods do not correlate well in the determination of atmospheric stability. However, the two values were within one stability class of each other more than 80% of the time.

    In its present form, the wind speed ratio method cannot be used for determination of atmospheric stability at the two coastal nuclear power plants that were examined.

    Modified sigma theta (MST) is a small improvement over the conventional sigma theta method. However, MST is still not an acceptable substitute for the temperature difference method in the determination of atmospheric stability.


    BONDARY LAYER DEVELOPMENT

    Thermal boundary Layer (TBL) development and maintenance depends on two factors: (i) convectively produced turbulence caused by solar heating of the surface and internal redistribution of heat under the cap of the stable layer, and (ii) mechanically produced turbulence originating from the vertical wind speed shear and the surface roughness. The figure given below shows the various physical processes involved in the TBL growth.

    Traditionally, two distinct approaches have been taken to predict the development of the thermal boundary layer: (i) theoretical approach and (ii) experimental studies.

    Experimental studies usually involve the determination of temperature profiles with time of day using direct or indirect (remote) sensing techniques. Direct sensing devices such as mini-sondes or thermocouples are used to record temperature variation with height while indirect methods may involve surface-based remote sensors such as acoustic radar to detect the TBL height.

    The theoretical approach may be classified into three groups:

      Empirical formulae,

      Analytical solutions,

      Numerical models

      One layer models,

      Higher order closure models.

    The prediction of the boundary layer height (H) as a function of time of day and time of year is based on the solution of the appropriate conservation equations relating both the heat flux and the temperature jump across the inversion layer to the height of the TBL.

    A comparison between calculated (using the analytical model) and observed TBL heights is shown in figure below. The TBL heights were obtained from minisonde data using single theodolite or double theodolite.

    The TBL heights depends on time of year and time of day. This is evident from the heat flux profiles given in the following figure.


    EFFECTS OF METEOROLOGY ON PLUME DISPERSION

    Meteorology plays an important role in the dispersion of effluents. Various meteorological factors affect the dispersion of emission into the atmosphere in a variety of ways. One of the most important meteorological variables responsible for high ground level concentrations is the height of thermal boundary layer (or mixing height).

    The following figure shows different situations of plume mixing in the atmosphere as a result of the development of the thermal boundary layer during a typical day. The figure shows that at 9 AM convective eddies pull the pollutant to the ground. The spread of the plume is also restricted in vertical due to the thermal boundary height at this time.

     For a small project on Plume Behavior and Dispersion go to

    "http://gunsmoke.ecn.purdue.edu/~wenning/project/"


    WIND VELOCITY

    Wind velocity is an important variable in the study of transport of air pollutants from a source. Considerable efforts have been spent to measure wind velocity and to develop equations for computing wind speed. A power law profile is generally used to describe the variation of wind speed with height in the surface boundary layer.

    Undisplayed Graphic

    where U1 is the velocity at z1 (usually 10 m) and U is the velocity at height z. The values of p are given in the following table.

    Table: Exponent for wind profile used in the ISC model


    Stability Class
    Rural p
    Urban p
    A - Very Unstable
    0.07
    0.15
    B - Moderately Unstable
    0.07
    0.15
    C - Slightly Unstable
    0.10
    0.20
    D - Neutral
    0.15
    0.25
    E - Moderately Stable
    0.35
    0.30
    F - Very Stable
    0.55
    0.30


    BEAUFORT SCALE

    The scale is helpful in getting an idea on the magnitude of wind speed from real life observations.

    Atmospheric Condition
    Wind Speed
    Comments
    Calm
    < 1 mph
    smoke rises vertically
    Light Breeze
    5 mph
    wind felt on face
    Gentle Breeze
    10 mph
    leaves and small twigs in constant motion
    Strong
    25 mph
    large branches in motion
    Violent Storm
    60 mph
    wide spread damage


    WIND ROSE

    Wind Rose diagram provides a graphical summary of the frequency distribution of wind direction and wind speed over an extended period of time. The following procedure is followed to develop a wind rose from hourly observations.

    Step I: Analysis for Wind Direction

    Group all winds of a given direction together using the table given below:

    All Winds From
    Direction
    0o
    Calm
    348.75o - 11.25o
    N
    11.25o - 33.75o
    NNE
    33.75o - 56.25o
    NE
    56.25o - 78.75o
    ENE
    78.75o - 101.25o
    E
    101.25o - 123.75o
    ESE
    123.75o - 146.25o
    SE
    146.25o - 168.75o
    SSE
    168.75o - 191.25o
    S
    191.25o - 213.75o
    SSW
    213.75o - 236.25o
    SW
    236.25o - 258.75o
    WSW
    258.75o - 281.15o
    W
    281.15o - 303.75o
    WNW
    303.75o - 326.25o
    NW
    326.25o - 348.75o
    NNW
    Step II: Determination of Frequency of Wind in Wind Direction

    Find the number of readings in each directional category and the total number of readings. Then find the percentage that each of the 16 wind directions occurs.

    Step III: Analysis for Wind Speed

      For each wind direction, group the readings into wind speed categories. For example, use ranges of 3 miles/hour , i.e. calm, 1-3 mph, 4-6 mph, 7-10 mph etc.

      For each wind direction, find the percentage of readings in each speed range.

    Step IV: Preparation of Polar Diagram

      On polar coordinate paper, label each of the 16 wind directions

      Plot each wind direction percentage from Step II making the length of each line proportional to its corresponding percentage.

      For each wind direction line plotted, divide into wind speed categories using the percentages calculated in Step III (2). Put the lowest         speed category (i.e. 1-3 mph) closest to the center of the graph, or,

      Put the percentage of calm winds (i.e. 0 mph) in the center circle of the graph.

    Step V: Determination of Mean Wind Speed

      For each wind direction, find the mean wind speed

      Plot each mean wind speed adjacent to the line plotted in Step IV(2) using an appropriate scale.

    Click here to see the polar diagram.

    Problem:

    Draw a wind rose showing both directional frequencies and wind speed frequencies from 3 hourly observations for a one week period for Toledo airport given in the following table.

    The observations were taken in December 1982 and are obtained from Local Climatological Data sheet for Toledo.

    DAY
    HOUR L.S.T.
    WIND
    DIRECTION
    WIND
    SPEED (KNOTS)
    1 01 
    04 
    07 
    10 
    13 
    16 
    19 
    22
    18 
    17 
    16 
    17 
    23 
    18 
    15 
    16







    7
    2 01 
    04 
    07 
    10 
    13 
    16 
    19 
    22
    18 
    15 
    14 
    18 
    17 
    16 
    16 
    18



    10 

    10 
    10 
    10
    3 01 
    04 
    07 
    10 
    13 
    16 
    19 
    22
    18 
    17 
    23 
    21 
    20 
    21 
    27 
    16
    11 
    13 
    14 

    13 
    13 

    10
    4 01 
    04 
    07 
    10 
    13 
    16 
    19 
    22
    33 
    27 
    28 
    34 
    04 
    06 
    09 
    08
    14 






    10
    5 01 
    04 
    07 
    10 
    13 
    16 
    19 
    22
    07 
    07 
    10 
    15 
    15 
    18 
    23 
    21

    10 

    10 
    13 
    12 
    15 
    15
    6 01 
    04 
    07 
    10 
    13 
    16 
    19 
    22
    21 
    22 
    28 
    29 
    31 
    29 
    26 
    24
    16 
    13 
    17 
    12 
    16 
    11 

    6
    7 01 
    04 
    07 
    10 
    13 
    16 
    19 
    22
    24 
    23 
    24 
    23 
    25 
    25 
    36 
    04







    6

     

    Note:
    WIND DIRECTION: DIRECTIONS ARE THOSE FROM WHICH THE WIND BLOWS, INDICATED IN TENS OF DEGREES FROM TRUE NORTH: I.E., 09 FOR EAST, 18 FOR SOUTH, 27 FOR WEST. AN ENTRY OF 00 INDICATES CALM.
    MPH = KNOTS x 1.151


    DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM MIXING HEIGHT

    The following steps can be used to determine the maximum mixing height for a day from a temperature profile:

    Problem: Find the maximum mixing height for the day shown in the figure given below. The maximum surface temperature for the day was 22oC.


    METEOROLOGICAL DATA

    Air pollution studies require data on wind speed, wind direction, mixing height, atmospheric stability and other meteorological variables. In the US, the data are available from NOAA (http://www.fsl.noaa.gov/) and the USEPA (www.epa.gov).


    QUESTIONS

    1. What term is used by meteorologists to describe the temperature change in the atmosphere that occurs with increasing height?

    2. What is the lapse rate that is the dividing line between stable and unstable atmospheric conditions?

    3. What type plume from an elevated source produces highest ground level concentration of pollutant?

    4. What type graphical display is used to estimate the stability of the atmosphere?

    5. Describe the inversion condition and how it may effect air pollution from a tall stack.

    6. What are the three general methods that can be used to maximize the dilution capacity of the atmosphere?

    7. What are the three most important meteorological variables to be measured for air pollution work?


    PROBLEMS

    1. The ground level wind velocity at 10 m elevation is 5.2 m/sec in a city. What would you estimate the velocity to be at 125m elevation in moderately stable atmosphere.

    2. If a parcel, initially at -27 oC at some level in the atmosphere, is heated dry adiabatically in descending to the 1000 mb pressure level to +15 oC , what is the parcel's potential temperature.

    3. Calculate the potential temperature for the following cases:
     

    Sl. No
    Pressure (mb)
    Temperature (oC)
    a. 920 20
    b. 980 28
    c. 820 25
    d. 945 10

    4. The wind speed is 1m/s at a height of 10m. Estimate the wind speed at heights of (a) 83m, and (b) 183m for the six stability conditions used in air quality models for a rural area.

    5. Plot the temperature variation for a day during this year (or last year). You can use information from weather service.

    6. What is the atmospheric stability for the standard deviation of horizontal wind direction: (a) 35o, (b) 15o, (c) 20o, (d) 10o, (e) 5o and (f) 1o.

    7. During a field program carried by a utility in Ohio, the atmospheric lapse rate on July 29, 1990 was found constant up to 1200 m. The pressure (Po) is 1067 mbar and the temperature (To) is 21 oC at ground level . A radiosonde measurement indicates that at some elevation z the pressure and temperature are 890 mbar and 9.5 oC respectively. Determine:

    8. Find the height above sea level where the pressure is 101 kpa for an atmosphere pressure of 110 kpa and an air density of 1.25 kg/m3.

    9. During a dispersion study the lapse rate was constant at 1.3oC per 100 m. If the atmosphere is assumes to behave as a perfect gas, at what altitude was the pressure one-fifth the sea level. The sea level temperature and pressure were 18oC and 1 atm respectively.

    10. Determine whether the atmosphere is unstable, neutral or stable for the following case.
     
    Initial Temperature 
    30.2 oC
    Final Temperature 
    - 58.5 oC
    Initial Height
    221 m
    Final Height
    23214 m

    11. Calculate the maximum mixing height from the following early morning temperature data given below:
     
    Height (m)
    0
    250
    350
    450
    550
    650
    Temperature (oC)
    9.5
    12.2
    15.1
    15.6
    16.2
    16.5

    The maximum surface temperature for the day was 15oC.


    References:

  • American Meteorological Society, "AMS Workshop on stability classification schemes and sigma curves- summary of recommendations," Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., Vol. 58, #12, pp. 1305-1509, 1977.
  • Beychok, M.R., "Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion", Irvine, CA, 1979.
  • Carpenter, S.B., "Principal Plume Dispersion Models: TVA power plants," J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., Vol. 23, pp. 491-495, et al. 1971.
  • Csanady, G.T., "Turbulent Diffusion in the Natural Environment", Reidal, 1973.
  • Draxler, R. R., "Determination of atmospheric diffusion parameters", Atmos. Environ., Vol. 10, pp. 99-105, 1976.
  • Gifford, F.A., "Use of Meteorological Observations for estimating atmospheric dispersion," Nuclear Safety, Vol 2, pp. 47-51, 1961.
  • Kumar, A., "Pollutant Dispersion in the Planetary Boundary Layer", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, 1977.
  • Kumar, A., "Estimation of Atmospheric Dispersion Coefficients for Elevated Releases", Preprint Volume, Fourth Symposium on Turbulence, Diffusion and Air Pollution (AMS), pp. 19-26, 1979.
  • Mitchell, A.E., & K.O. Timbre, "Atmospheric stability class from horizontal wind fluctuations," 79-29.2, presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1979.
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Meteorological programs in support of nuclear power plants," Proposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.23, 1980.
  • Pasquill, F., "The estimation of the dispersion of wind borne material," Met. Mag., Vol. 90, pp. 33-49, 1961.
  • Scott-Waslik, J., & A. Kumar, "Analysis of Atmospheric Stability Schemes for a Coastal Nuclear Power Plant," Proceedings of 1982 National Environmental Engineering Conference, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1982.
  • Sedefian, L., & E. Bennett, "A comparison of turbulence classification schemes", Atmospheric Environment, 14: pp. 741-750, 1980.
  • Slade, D.H. (Ed.) , Meteorology and Atomic Energy, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission/Division of Technical Information, 1968.
  • Smith, F.B., "A scheme for estimating the vertical dispersion from a source near ground," Proceedings NATO/CEMS Third Meeting, 1972.
  • Smith, M.E., & I.A. Singer, "An improved method for estimating concentrations and related phenomena from a point source emission," USAEC Report BNL-9700, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1965.
  • Sutton, O.G., "The theoritical distribution of airborne pollution from factory chimneys," QJRMS, Vol. 73, pp. 426-436, 1947.
  • Venkatram, A., "A Model of Internal Boundary Layer Development", Boundary Layer Meteorology, Vol. 11, pp. 419-437, 1977.
  • Weil, J.F., "Comparison between measured and model-estimated ground level SO2 concentrations downwind from the Dickersion Power Plant," Martin Marietta Laboratories, 1974.

  •  

     
     
     
     
     



     
      Back to Table of Contents
    Drop in your comments and suggestions to
    Ashok Kumar, akumar@uoft02.utoledo.edu
    Sunil Ojha, sojha@eng.utoledo.edu
    | The University of Toledo| | College of Engineering | | Department of Civil Engineering |
    | Air Pollution Research Group | | Courses |