BASIC METEOROLOGICAL PROCESSES
AIR
POLLUTION METEOROLOGY
In order to perform dispersion calculations which
are discussed in the air quality modeling section, it is important for
one to understand meteorological aspects of air pollution. In this section
basic concepts of meteorology are discussed for solving and understanding
air pollution problems. The chapter is divided into four major sections:
atmospheric thermodynamics
atmospheric stability
boundary layer development
effect of meteorology on plume dispersion.
The site also includes important links to various
weather forecasting and meteorological institutions all over.
ATMOSPHERE
The problem of air pollution occurs in the earth's
atmosphere. The chemical composition and the physical characteristics of
the atmosphere are helpful for interpretation of the pollution cloud. The
atmosphere is a mixture of gases. The concentration of each gas varies
from trace levels to very high levels. Nitrogen and oxygen are the main
constituents. Some constituents such as water vapor vary in space and time.
The earth’s atmosphere can be divided into several
layers, depending on the temperature profile. The four major layers are:
troposphere
stratosphere
mesosphere
thermosphere.
The discussion in this course will be limited to
troposphere, and stratosphere.
ATMOSPHERIC
THERMODYNAMICS
In order to study the atmospheric flows, a parcel
of air is defined using the state variables. These variables define the
state of an element of the atmosphere. The three important state variables
are density, pressure and temperature. For an explanation of atmospheric
pressure and experiments you can perform to examine the force exerted by
the weight of air, go to "http://kids.mtpe.hq.nasa.gov/air_pressure/index.html"
The units and dimensions for the state variables
are given in the following table.
Table
Units and Dimensions for State Variables
| Density ( Mass / Volume ) |
gm / cm 3
|
M L - 3
|
| Pressure ( Force / Area ) |
N / m 2
millibar = 10 -3 bar
1 bar = 10 6 dynes / cm 2
1 atm = 1013.25 mb
1 atm = 101.325 kPa
|
M L - 1 T - 2
|
| Temperature |
o F, o R, o C, o K
o C = o K - 273.15
|
T
|
Humidity is the fourth important variable in the study
of atmospheric flows which tells us about the amount of water vapor present
in a sample of moist air.
Meteorologists also use the term specific volume instead
of density. The specific volume is defined as:
Specific Volume,
=
1 / Density
Problem 1
Determine the pressure, both absolute and gauge, exerted at the bottom
of the column of liquid 1 meter high, with density of 1200 kg / m3
Solution
Pgauge = (density of liquid) X ( acceleration due to gravity) X (height
of liquid column)
Pgauge = ( 1200 kg/m3 ) X ( 9.7 m/s2 ) X (
1 N/kg/m/s2)
Pgauge = 11.760 kN/m2
Pgauge = 11.760 kPa
Pabsolute = Pgauge + Patmospheric
Pabsolute = 11.760 kPa + 101.3 kPa
Pabsolute = 113.06 kPa
Equation
of State
The relationship between the three state variables may be written
as:
For a perfect gas,
where,
The specific gas constant for dry air, R d = 0.287 Joules / gm /oK,
and for water vapor, R v = 0.461 Joules / gm /oK. The specific
gas constant for wet air will not be constant quantity but will depend
on mixing ratio.
Problem 2
Calculate the density of a gas with a molecular weight of 29 @ 1
atm(absolute) and 80 oF. Gas constant, R = 0.7302 ft3atm/lb-moleoR
Solution
Absolute Temperature = 80 oF + 460 = 540 oR
Density = P ( molecular weight) / RT
Density = ( 1atm. ) . (29 lb/lb mole) / ( 0.7302 ft3atm/lb-moleoR).
(540 oR)
Density = 0.073546 lb/ ft3
Solve this problem online using applet DENS
1.0.
First
Law of Thermodynamics
The first law of thermodynamics is based on the law of conservation
of total energy of a thermodynamic system which undergoes a change of state.
Mathematically one can write it as:
Heat added per unit mass = (Change in internal energy per unit mass)
+ (work done by a unit mass)
Second
Law of thermodynamics
There are several different statements for the second law of thermodynamics
in the physics books. In summary, the law can be stated as "no cyclic process
exists having the transference of heat from a colder to hotter body as
its sole effect".
Specific
Heats
The specific heat is defined as the amount of heat needed to change
the temperature of unit mass by 1oK. The specific heat can be
computed at the constant volume or at constant pressure. The definitions
are:
Specific Heat at Constant Volume
Specific Heat at Constant Pressure
The Carnot's Law provides a relationship between Cp and Cv. For a
perfect gas,
C p - C v = R
For a perfect diatomic gas ( approximation to dry air), Cp and Cv
can be obtained from,
C p = (7/2) . R, and
C v = (5/2) . R
For dry air, the value of
C pd = 1.003 Joules / gm / oK, and
C vd = 0.717 Joules / gm / oK
The ratio of Cp, and Cv is given by
=
Cp / Cv = 1.4 (for dry air). The value of
for dry air is 1.4. The value of
will be different for different gases.
PROCESSES
IN THE ATMOSPHERE
When an air parcel moves from one point to another point in the atmosphere,
it can follow several different paths. These are:
Constant Pressure known as " isobaric " change
Constant Volume known as " isosteric " change
Constant Temperature known as " isothermal " change
Constant Entropy known as " Isentropic " change
Adiabatic Process i.e.
Q=
0 (no heat added or removed from the air parcel)
The adiabatic Law is 
STATISTICS
OF THE ATMOSPHERE
The vertical variations of parameters such as pressure are studied.
The Hydrostatic Equation:
The pressure variation in a "motionless" atmosphere is given by:

where, the left hand side term is the vertical pressure gradient per unit
mass, and the right hand side term represents gravitational force per unit
mass.
If the atmosphere is not "motionless", Newton's second law can be
used to write the general equation as:

The hydrostatic equation can be used to derive a relationship between
pressure and elevation of the air parcel. The hydrostatic equation and
the equation of state can be rewritten as:

Integration of the equation yields:

The initial conditions used in the integration are: z = 0, p = 0
Thus the variation of pressure depends on the vertical profile of temperature.
For an isothermal atmosphere, one can integrate the left hand side term
of the above equation as:

Where, To is the temperature of isothermal atmosphere.
Simple calculation using the equation show that the pressure decreases
exponentially with height at a ratio of 12.24 mb per 100 meter.
LAPSE
RATE
The lapse rate is the rate of change of temperature with height and is
defined as,

The value of
varies throughout the atmosphere.
POTENTIAL
TEMPERATURE
In order to compare two air parcels at the same temperatures and different
pressures, the concept of potential temperature is useful.
The relationship between temperature and pressure can be derived using
the first law of thermodynamics as follows:

Consider adiabatic flow
dH = 0
0 = Cp dT - a dp
0 = Cp dT - (RT/p)*dp
Cp dT = (RT/p)*dp
dT/T = (R/Cp)*(dp/p)
d (ln T) = (R/Cp)*d(ln p)
Integrate from ( T, p ) to ( To, po )

Define potential temperature
as the temperature corresponding to the pressure po = 1000 mb,

ATMOSPHERIC
STABILITY
Atmospheric stability is defined as the ability of the atmosphere to enhance
or to resist atmospheric motions. A simple way to determine the atmospheric
stability is to use dry adiabatic lapse rate (
d).
The following table shows the conditions for different atmospheric lapse
rates.
|
LAPSE RATE
|
ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY
|
> d
|
Unstable
|
= d
|
Neutral
|
< d
|
Stable
|
In the above table, the value of the dry adiabatic lapse rate is -1 oC/100
m. The environmental lapse rate is positive in a strongly stable atmosphere
while it is negative in an unstable atmosphere.
For more detailed information on Atmospheric Stability, go to the following
slide show.
and
ATMOSPHERIC
STABILITY CLASSIFICATION
Over the last several decades, a number of classification systems
have been proposed to define atmospheric stability. Some of these schemes
are explained below.
P-
G Method
P- G method is one of the oldest methods to define atmospheric stability.
The method requires the measurements of
Horizontal wind speed,
Cloud cover,
Ceiling height and
Time of observation
The approach is based on original field work. The cloud observations are
expensive. The scheme is given in the following table:
PASQUILL-
GIFFORD STABILITY CATEGORIES
|
Surface Wind
( Measured at 10 m )
( m / sec. )
|
Surface Wind
( Measured at 10 m )
( mph )
|
Day
Incoming Solar Radiation**
( Insolation )
( Strong )
|
Day
Incoming Solar Radiation**
( Insolation )
( Moderate )
|
Day
Incoming Solar Radiation**
( Insolation )
( Slight )
|
Night*
( Thin Overlast
or
>= 4/8 cloudiness* )
|
Night*
( <= 3/8 cloudiness* )
|
|
< 2
|
< 4.5
|
A
|
A-B
|
B
|
F
|
F
|
|
2 - 3
|
4.5 - 6.7
|
A-B
|
B
|
C
|
E
|
F
|
|
3 - 5
|
6.7 - 11.2
|
B
|
B-C
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
|
5 - 6
|
11.2 - 13.4
|
C
|
C-D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
|
6
|
13.4
|
C
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
* Night is defined as the period from 1 hour before sunset
to 1 hr. after sunrise
** Appropriate insolation categories may be determined through the
use of sky cover and solar elevation information as follows :
|
Sky Cover
( Opaque or Total )
|
Solar Elevation
Angle > 60 o
|
Solar Elevation
Angle < 60 o
but, > 35 o
|
Solar Elevation
Angle < 35 o
but, > 15 o
|
|
4/8 or less or,
Any amount of High Thin Clouds
|
Strong
|
Moderate
|
Slight
|
|
5/8 to 7/8 Middle Clouds
( 700 ft. - 16000 ft. base )
|
Moderate
|
Slight
|
Slight
|
|
5/8 to 7/8 Low Clouds
( Less than 7000 foot base )
|
Slight
|
Slight
|
Slight
|
P-G
/ NWS Method
This is a variation of P-G method. The only difference between P-G method
and this method is that on-site cloud cover observations are replaced by
the observation taken at the National Weather Service (NWS) station in
that area. The disadvantage of the method is the use of second-hand information
for cloud cover.
The
STAR Method
The instrumentation for monitoring atmospheric stability is relatively
expensive and is typically difficult to maintain. The instruments are used
in remote locations where trained environmental scientists are not present,
and at facilities where personnel are engaged in activities other than
the hour by hour monitoring of the weather and/or at plants where it is
required by law. The national Climatic Center ( NCC ) in Asheville, North
Carolina utilizes a stability computation method which does not require
special instruments but, rather, relies solely on the hourly weather observations
made by meteorologists at National Weather Service ( NWS ) stations. Unstable
conditions occur primarily during periods of strong surface heating and
low wind speeds, and stable conditions occur only when the earth's heat
is escaping to space ( high negative net radiation ) and winds are light.
Also, neutral conditions can occur when it is cloudy and/or windy. The
NCC method, then utilizes observations of cloud cover, made hourly by stations
weather observer, coupled with the wind speed observed when the sky observation
was made.
The data produced from the cloud cover and wind speed observations are
referred to as STAR ( for STability ARray ) data. Historical STAR data
are extremely useful because they can be obtained quickly from the NCC
and they are inexpensive.
BNL
Scheme
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) scheme depends entirely on horizontal
wind direction fluctuations. This system will not work if a definite relationship
between horizontal fluctuation and vertical fluctuation does not exist
at a site.
The classification are as follows:
Type A : Fluctuations ( peak to peak ) of the horizontal wind
direction exceeding 90o ( Extremely Unstable )
Type B2 : Fluctuations ranging from 40o - 90o
Type B1 : Fluctuations similar to A and B2, but confined to 15o and 45o
limits ( Unstable )
Type C : Fluctuations greater than 15o distinguished
by the unbroken solid core of the trace ( Neutral )
Type D : The trace approximates a line; short - term fluctuations
do not exceed 15o ( Stable )
Note : Fluctuations are recorded over a 1 hr. period.
Sigma
Phi Method:
The atmospheric stability can be determined using the standard deviation
of elevation angle (phi) of the vertical wind direction. Sigma phi is a
good indicator of the scale and intensity of the vertical motions of the
atmosphere. The disadvantage of the method is that it requires a highly
dedicated maintenance program to assure proper calibration of the system.
Sigma
Omega Method:
In this method, sigma phi is indirectly calculated using the standard deviation
of the vertical wind speed (sigma omega) and the average horizontal wind
speed. This approach reduces the maintenance requirements of the sigma
phi method.
Wind
Direction Standard Deviation (Sigma Theta) Method:
The standard deviation of horizontal wind direction is an atmospheric stability
classification system recommended by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The limits of sigma theta as given in Regulatory Guide 1.23 are given in
the following table.
Modified
Sigma Theta Method:
Mitchell and Timbre (1979) attempted to modify the NRC sigma theta method
(MST) in order to account for lack of insolation during nighttime. The
definition for nighttime was: one hour before sunset to one hour after
sunrise. According to MST scheme, if stability class based on sigma theta
at night is neutral (D) or stable (E,F,G), the stability class is based
directly on sigma theta. If it is unstable (A,B,C), the observed wind speed
and corresponding stability class are located in the following table and
the associated stability class applicable to sigma z is identified. The
MST method involves correction factors for plume meander that occur under
low wind speed and nighttime conditions.
NRC
Temperature Difference Method:
NRC Regulatory Guide 1.23 indicates the use of temperature differences
with height for computing standard deviations of the plume. This method
relates a set of ranges of temperature lapse rates (oC/100m)
to the Pasquill-Gifford classes.
Wind
Speed ratio (UR) Method:
Sedefian and Bennett (1980) suggested the use of wind speed ratio (UR)
for defining the atmospheric stability. The relationship between stability
and UR is shown below.
Four different atmospheric stability indicators have been examined by Scott-Waslikand
& Kumar (1982) for their potential use in a radio nuclide dispersion
model at a nuclear power plant.
The schemes are:
NRC Temperature Difference Method
NRC Sigma Theta Method
Modified Sigma Theta (MST) Method
Wind Speed Ratio Method
The other four schemes were not studied because sufficient meteorological
data were unavailable. Inconsistencies were observed between the four schemes
for the seven stability classes. The results of this analysis indicate:
The temperature difference and sigma theta methods do not correlate well
in the determination of atmospheric stability. However, the two values
were within one stability class of each other more than 80% of the time.
In its present form, the wind speed ratio method cannot be used for determination
of atmospheric stability at the two coastal nuclear power plants that were
examined.
Modified sigma theta (MST) is a small improvement over the conventional
sigma theta method. However, MST is still not an acceptable substitute
for the temperature difference method in the determination of atmospheric
stability.
BONDARY
LAYER DEVELOPMENT
Thermal boundary Layer (TBL) development and maintenance depends on two
factors: (i) convectively produced turbulence caused by solar heating of
the surface and internal redistribution of heat under the cap of the stable
layer, and (ii) mechanically produced turbulence originating from the vertical
wind speed shear and the surface roughness. The figure given below shows
the various physical processes involved in the TBL growth.
Traditionally, two distinct approaches have been taken to predict the development
of the thermal boundary layer: (i) theoretical approach and (ii) experimental
studies.
Experimental studies usually involve the determination of temperature profiles
with time of day using direct or indirect (remote) sensing techniques.
Direct sensing devices such as mini-sondes or thermocouples are used to
record temperature variation with height while indirect methods may involve
surface-based remote sensors such as acoustic radar to detect the TBL height.
The theoretical approach may be classified into three groups:
Empirical
formulae,
Analytical
solutions,
Numerical
models
One
layer models,
Higher
order closure models.
The prediction of the boundary layer height (H) as a function of time of
day and time of year is based on the solution of the appropriate conservation
equations relating both the heat flux and the temperature jump across the
inversion layer to the height of the TBL.
A comparison between calculated (using the analytical model) and observed
TBL heights is shown in figure below. The TBL heights were obtained from
minisonde data using single theodolite or double theodolite.
The TBL heights depends on time of year and time of day. This is evident
from the heat flux profiles given in the following figure.
EFFECTS
OF METEOROLOGY ON PLUME DISPERSION
Meteorology plays an important role in the dispersion of effluents. Various
meteorological factors affect the dispersion of emission into the atmosphere
in a variety of ways. One of the most important meteorological variables
responsible for high ground level concentrations is the height of thermal
boundary layer (or mixing height).
The following figure shows different situations of plume mixing in the
atmosphere as a result of the development of the thermal boundary layer
during a typical day. The figure shows that at 9 AM convective eddies pull
the pollutant to the ground. The spread of the plume is also restricted
in vertical due to the thermal boundary height at this time.
For a small project on Plume Behavior and Dispersion go to
WIND
VELOCITY
Wind velocity is an important variable in the study of transport of air
pollutants from a source. Considerable efforts have been spent to measure
wind velocity and to develop equations for computing wind speed. A power
law profile is generally used to describe the variation of wind speed with
height in the surface boundary layer.
where U1 is the velocity at z1 (usually 10 m) and
U is the velocity at height z. The values of p are given in the following
table.
Table: Exponent for wind profile used in the ISC model
|
Stability Class
|
Rural p
|
Urban p
|
| A - Very Unstable |
0.07
|
0.15
|
| B - Moderately Unstable |
0.07
|
0.15
|
| C - Slightly Unstable |
0.10
|
0.20
|
| D - Neutral |
0.15
|
0.25
|
| E - Moderately Stable |
0.35
|
0.30
|
| F - Very Stable |
0.55
|
0.30
|
BEAUFORT
SCALE
The scale is helpful in getting an idea on the magnitude of wind speed
from real life observations.
|
Atmospheric Condition
|
Wind Speed
|
Comments
|
| Calm |
< 1 mph
|
smoke rises vertically |
| Light Breeze |
5 mph
|
wind felt on face |
| Gentle Breeze |
10 mph
|
leaves and small twigs in constant motion |
| Strong |
25 mph
|
large branches in motion |
| Violent Storm |
60 mph
|
wide spread damage |
WIND
ROSE
Wind Rose diagram provides a graphical summary of the frequency distribution
of wind direction and wind speed over an extended period of time. The following
procedure is followed to develop a wind rose from hourly observations.
Step I: Analysis for Wind Direction
Group all winds of a given direction together using the table given below:
|
All Winds From
|
Direction
|
|
0o
|
Calm
|
|
348.75o - 11.25o
|
N
|
|
11.25o - 33.75o
|
NNE
|
|
33.75o - 56.25o
|
NE
|
|
56.25o - 78.75o
|
ENE
|
|
78.75o - 101.25o
|
E
|
|
101.25o - 123.75o
|
ESE
|
|
123.75o - 146.25o
|
SE
|
|
146.25o - 168.75o
|
SSE
|
|
168.75o - 191.25o
|
S
|
|
191.25o - 213.75o
|
SSW
|
|
213.75o - 236.25o
|
SW
|
|
236.25o - 258.75o
|
WSW
|
|
258.75o - 281.15o
|
W
|
|
281.15o - 303.75o
|
WNW
|
|
303.75o - 326.25o
|
NW
|
|
326.25o - 348.75o
|
NNW
|
Step II: Determination of Frequency of Wind in Wind Direction
Find the number of readings in each directional category and the total
number of readings. Then find the percentage that each of the 16 wind directions
occurs.
Step III: Analysis for Wind Speed
For
each wind direction, group the readings into wind speed categories. For
example, use ranges of 3 miles/hour , i.e. calm, 1-3 mph, 4-6 mph, 7-10
mph etc.
For
each wind direction, find the percentage of readings in each speed range.
Step IV: Preparation of Polar Diagram
On
polar coordinate paper, label each of the 16 wind directions
Plot
each wind direction percentage from Step II making the length of each line
proportional to its corresponding percentage.
For
each wind direction line plotted, divide into wind speed categories using
the percentages calculated in Step III (2). Put the lowest
speed category (i.e. 1-3 mph) closest to the center of the graph, or,
Put
the percentage of calm winds (i.e. 0 mph) in the center circle of the graph.
Step V: Determination of Mean Wind Speed
For
each wind direction, find the mean wind speed
Plot
each mean wind speed adjacent to the line plotted in Step IV(2) using an
appropriate scale.
Problem:
Draw a wind rose showing both directional frequencies and wind speed
frequencies from 3 hourly observations for a one week period for Toledo
airport given in the following table.
The observations were taken in December 1982 and are obtained from
Local Climatological Data sheet for Toledo.
|
DAY
|
HOUR L.S.T.
|
WIND
DIRECTION
|
WIND
SPEED (KNOTS)
|
| 1 |
01
04
07
10
13
16
19
22 |
18
17
16
17
23
18
15
16 |
6
5
5
6
7
6
7
7 |
| 2 |
01
04
07
10
13
16
19
22 |
18
15
14
18
17
16
16
18 |
6
7
7
10
9
10
10
10 |
| 3 |
01
04
07
10
13
16
19
22 |
18
17
23
21
20
21
27
16 |
11
13
14
8
13
13
7
10 |
| 4 |
01
04
07
10
13
16
19
22 |
33
27
28
34
04
06
09
08 |
14
4
6
5
3
6
9
10 |
| 5 |
01
04
07
10
13
16
19
22 |
07
07
10
15
15
18
23
21 |
7
10
6
10
13
12
15
15 |
| 6 |
01
04
07
10
13
16
19
22 |
21
22
28
29
31
29
26
24 |
16
13
17
12
16
11
8
6 |
| 7 |
01
04
07
10
13
16
19
22 |
24
23
24
23
25
25
36
04 |
7
8
7
7
9
8
3
6 |
Note:
| WIND DIRECTION: |
DIRECTIONS ARE THOSE FROM WHICH THE WIND BLOWS, INDICATED IN TENS
OF DEGREES FROM TRUE NORTH: I.E., 09 FOR EAST, 18 FOR SOUTH, 27 FOR WEST.
AN ENTRY OF 00 INDICATES CALM. |
| MPH = KNOTS x 1.151 |
|
DETERMINATION
OF MAXIMUM MIXING HEIGHT
The following steps can be used to determine the maximum mixing height
for a day from a temperature profile:
Plot
the temperature profile, if needed.
Plot
the maximum surface temperature for the day on the graph for morning temperature
profile.
Draw
a dry adiabatic line (-1oC/100m) from the point of maximum surface
temperature to the point where it interests the morning temperature profile.
Read
the corresponding height above ground at the point of intersection obtained
in step 2. This is the maximum mixing height for the day.
Problem: Find the maximum mixing height for the day shown in the
figure given below. The maximum surface temperature for the day was 22oC.
METEOROLOGICAL
DATA
Air pollution studies require data on wind speed, wind direction, mixing
height, atmospheric stability and other meteorological variables. In the
US, the data are available from NOAA (http://www.fsl.noaa.gov/)
and the USEPA (www.epa.gov).
QUESTIONS
1. What term is used by meteorologists to describe the temperature
change in the atmosphere that occurs with increasing height?
2. What is the lapse rate that is the dividing line between stable
and unstable atmospheric conditions?
3. What type plume from an elevated source produces highest ground
level concentration of pollutant?
4. What type graphical display is used to estimate the stability
of the atmosphere?
5. Describe the inversion condition and how it may effect air pollution
from a tall stack.
6. What are the three general methods that can be used to maximize
the dilution capacity of the atmosphere?
7. What are the three most important meteorological variables to
be measured for air pollution work?
PROBLEMS
1. The ground level wind velocity at 10 m elevation is 5.2 m/sec
in a city. What would you estimate the velocity to be at 125m elevation
in moderately stable atmosphere.
2. If a parcel, initially at -27 oC at some level in the
atmosphere, is heated dry adiabatically in descending to the 1000 mb pressure
level to +15 oC , what is the parcel's potential temperature.
3. Calculate the potential temperature for the following cases:
|
Sl. No
|
Pressure (mb)
|
Temperature (oC)
|
| a. |
920 |
20 |
| b. |
980 |
28 |
| c. |
820 |
25 |
| d. |
945 |
10 |
4. The wind speed is 1m/s at a height of 10m. Estimate the wind speed
at heights of (a) 83m, and (b) 183m for the six stability conditions used
in air quality models for a rural area.
5. Plot the temperature variation for a day during this year (or
last year). You can use information from weather service.
6. What is the atmospheric stability for the standard deviation of
horizontal wind direction: (a) 35o, (b) 15o, (c)
20o, (d) 10o, (e) 5o and (f) 1o.
7. During a field program carried by a utility in Ohio, the atmospheric
lapse rate on July 29, 1990 was found constant up to 1200 m. The pressure
(Po) is 1067 mbar and the temperature (To) is 21 oC at ground
level . A radiosonde measurement indicates that at some elevation z the
pressure and temperature are 890 mbar and 9.5 oC respectively.
Determine:
-
the atmospheric temperature gradient dT/dz in degree Kelvin per meter
-
the elevation of the observation.
8. Find the height above sea level where the pressure is 101 kpa for
an atmosphere pressure of 110 kpa and an air density of 1.25 kg/m3.
9. During a dispersion study the lapse rate was constant at 1.3oC
per 100 m. If the atmosphere is assumes to behave as a perfect gas, at
what altitude was the pressure one-fifth the sea level. The sea level temperature
and pressure were 18oC and 1 atm respectively.
10. Determine whether the atmosphere is unstable, neutral or stable
for the following case.
|
Initial Temperature
|
30.2 oC
|
|
Final Temperature
|
- 58.5 oC
|
|
Initial Height
|
221 m
|
|
Final Height
|
23214 m
|
11. Calculate the maximum mixing height from the following early
morning temperature data given below:
|
Height (m)
|
0
|
250
|
350
|
450
|
550
|
650
|
|
Temperature (oC)
|
9.5
|
12.2
|
15.1
|
15.6
|
16.2
|
16.5
|
The maximum surface temperature for the day was 15oC.
References:
American Meteorological Society, "AMS Workshop on stability classification
schemes and sigma curves- summary of recommendations," Bull. Amer. Meteor.
Soc., Vol. 58, #12, pp. 1305-1509, 1977.
Beychok, M.R., "Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion", Irvine, CA, 1979.
Carpenter, S.B., "Principal Plume Dispersion Models: TVA power plants,"
J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., Vol. 23, pp. 491-495, et al. 1971.
Csanady, G.T., "Turbulent Diffusion in the Natural Environment", Reidal,
1973.
Draxler, R. R., "Determination of atmospheric diffusion parameters",
Atmos. Environ., Vol. 10, pp. 99-105, 1976.
Gifford, F.A., "Use of Meteorological Observations for estimating atmospheric
dispersion," Nuclear Safety, Vol 2, pp. 47-51, 1961.
Kumar, A., "Pollutant Dispersion in the Planetary Boundary Layer", Ph.D.
Thesis, University of Waterloo, 1977.
Kumar, A., "Estimation of Atmospheric Dispersion Coefficients for Elevated
Releases", Preprint Volume, Fourth Symposium on Turbulence, Diffusion and
Air Pollution (AMS), pp. 19-26, 1979.
Mitchell, A.E., & K.O. Timbre, "Atmospheric stability class from
horizontal wind fluctuations," 79-29.2, presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting
of the Air Pollution Control Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1979.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Meteorological programs in support of
nuclear power plants," Proposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.23, 1980.
Pasquill, F., "The estimation of the dispersion of wind borne material,"
Met. Mag., Vol. 90, pp. 33-49, 1961.
Scott-Waslik, J., & A. Kumar, "Analysis of Atmospheric Stability
Schemes for a Coastal Nuclear Power Plant," Proceedings of 1982 National
Environmental Engineering Conference, American Society of Civil Engineers,
1982.
Sedefian, L., & E. Bennett, "A comparison of turbulence classification
schemes", Atmospheric Environment, 14: pp. 741-750, 1980.
Slade, D.H. (Ed.) , Meteorology and Atomic Energy, U.S. Atomic Energy
Commission/Division of Technical Information, 1968.
Smith, F.B., "A scheme for estimating the vertical dispersion from a
source near ground," Proceedings NATO/CEMS Third Meeting, 1972.
Smith, M.E., & I.A. Singer, "An improved method for estimating concentrations
and related phenomena from a point source emission," USAEC Report BNL-9700,
Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1965.
Sutton, O.G., "The theoritical distribution of airborne pollution from
factory chimneys," QJRMS, Vol. 73, pp. 426-436, 1947.
Venkatram, A., "A Model of Internal Boundary Layer Development", Boundary
Layer Meteorology, Vol. 11, pp. 419-437, 1977.
Weil, J.F., "Comparison between measured and model-estimated ground
level SO2 concentrations downwind from the Dickersion Power
Plant," Martin Marietta Laboratories, 1974.
Back to Table of Contents
Drop in your comments and suggestions to
Ashok Kumar, akumar@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Sunil Ojha, sojha@eng.utoledo.edu
| The University of Toledo| | College
of Engineering | | Department
of Civil Engineering |
| Air Pollution Research Group
| | Courses
|